The Real Cost of Email Marketing in 2026

Here’s a number that should make you pause: businesses sending 100,000 emails per month on Mailchimp’s Standard plan pay around $135/month. The same volume on AWS SES? Just $10.

That’s not a typo. It’s a 13x price difference.

But pricing alone doesn’t tell the whole story. AWS SES gives you raw sending power with zero hand-holding. Mailchimp wraps everything in a polished UI but charges a premium for it. Choosing between them depends on your team’s technical ability, your budget, and how fast you’re growing.

This guide breaks down AWS SES vs Mailchimp across pricing, features, deliverability, ease of use, scalability, and more. We’ll also show you a third option that gives you the best of both worlds, especially if you’re based in India.

AWS SES vs Mailchimp: Quick Overview

Amazon Simple Email Service (SES) is a cloud-based email sending service built for developers. It runs on Amazon’s infrastructure and handles transactional emails, marketing campaigns, and bulk sends at scale. There’s no drag-and-drop editor, no built-in contact management, and no visual campaign builder. You get an API, SMTP relay, and rock-solid deliverability.

Mailchimp is an all-in-one marketing platform. It includes email templates, audience management, automation workflows, landing pages, and analytics. It’s designed for marketers who want a visual interface without writing code.

Think of it this way: AWS SES is the engine. Mailchimp is the entire car. The question is whether you need the whole car, or just a powerful engine with a custom dashboard on top.

Pricing Comparison: AWS SES vs Mailchimp

This is where the gap is massive. Let’s look at real numbers.

AWS SES Pricing (2026)

AWS SES uses pure pay-as-you-go pricing:

• $0.10 per 1,000 emails (that’s $1 per 10,000 emails)
• Free tier: 3,000 emails/month free for the first 12 months
• Attachments: $0.12 per GB of data
• Dedicated IPs: $24.95/month per IP (optional)
• No contact-based charges. You only pay for what you send.

For a detailed breakdown, check our complete AWS email service pricing guide.

Mailchimp Pricing (2026)

Mailchimp charges based on the number of contacts (not just subscribers, but all contacts including unsubscribed ones):

Cost Comparison: 100,000 Emails/Month

Let’s do the math for a business sending 100,000 emails per month to a list of 25,000 contacts:

• AWS SES: 100,000 × $0.10/1,000 = $10/month (roughly ₹830)
• Mailchimp Standard (25K contacts): $270/month (roughly ₹22,400)
• Mailchimp Essentials (25K contacts): $270/month (roughly ₹22,400)

That’s a difference of $260/month, or $3,120 per year (about ₹2.6 lakh). For a startup in Bangalore or a D2C brand in Mumbai, that’s budget you could redirect to ad spend, content creation, or hiring.

The catch? AWS SES at $10/month gives you zero UI. No templates, no drag-and-drop, no subscriber management. You need a developer or a front-end tool on top of it.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Here’s how AWS SES and Mailchimp stack up across key features:

The takeaway: Mailchimp wins on convenience. AWS SES wins on flexibility and cost. If you’re technical, SES gives you more control. If you want everything pre-built, Mailchimp handles it, but you’ll pay significantly more.

Deliverability: Who Gets More Emails to the Inbox?

Both platforms have strong deliverability, but they approach it differently.

AWS SES gives you full control over your sending reputation. You manage your own domain authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), IP warming, and bounce handling. This means deliverability is directly tied to your practices. Do it right, and you’ll see inbox placement rates above 95%. Do it wrong, and you’ll end up in spam.

Getting into production mode requires an application process. If you’re new to SES, our guide on how to get AWS SES production access walks you through it step by step.

Mailchimp uses shared IP pools for most users (dedicated IPs are available on Premium plans). Your deliverability is partly affected by other senders on the same IP. Mailchimp does enforce strict anti-spam policies, which helps maintain pool quality. But you have less direct control.

For high-volume senders (100K+ emails/month), AWS SES with a dedicated IP typically outperforms Mailchimp’s shared pool. For smaller senders, the difference is negligible.

Ease of Use

This is where Mailchimp dominates. Sign up, import your contacts, pick a template, write your content, hit send. A non-technical marketer can launch a campaign in under 30 minutes.

AWS SES? You’ll need to:

1. Set up an AWS account and navigate the console
2. Verify your domain and configure DNS records
3. Request production access (sandbox mode limits you to verified emails only)
4. Build your emails in HTML or integrate via API/SMTP
5. Set up bounce and complaint handling
6. Build or buy a front-end for campaign management

For a developer, this takes a few hours. For a marketer without coding experience, it’s a non-starter.

This gap is exactly why tools like campaign management platforms exist: they sit on top of AWS SES and give you the visual interface, while keeping SES pricing underneath.

Scalability

AWS SES is built for scale. It handles billions of emails daily for companies like Amazon, Netflix, and Reddit. Your sending limits start at 200 emails/second in production and can be increased by request. There’s no practical ceiling.

Mailchimp handles scale too, but cost becomes the bottleneck. At 100,000 contacts on the Standard plan, you’re paying $450/month. At 200,000 contacts, you’ll cross $800/month. And Mailchimp imposes send limits per plan tier, so exceeding those costs extra.

If your email volume is growing fast (common for Indian D2C brands running festive season campaigns), AWS SES scales linearly at $0.10/1,000 emails regardless of list size. Mailchimp’s contact-based pricing makes scaling expensive.

API and Integration

AWS SES offers a robust REST API (v2), SMTP interface, and deep integration with other AWS services: Lambda for serverless processing, S3 for storing emails, SNS for notifications, CloudWatch for monitoring. If your stack is already on AWS, SES fits naturally.

Mailchimp has a well-documented REST API and 300+ integrations via its marketplace (Shopify, WordPress, Zapier, Salesforce, etc.). For marketers using popular SaaS tools, Mailchimp’s ecosystem is hard to beat.

For developers building custom workflows, SES is more powerful. For marketers connecting off-the-shelf tools, Mailchimp is easier.

Customer Support

AWS SES: Support depends on your AWS Support plan. The free tier gives you documentation and forums only. Business support ($100+/month) gets you 24/7 access to engineers. There’s no email marketing-specific support: AWS treats SES as infrastructure, not a marketing tool.

Mailchimp: Free plan gets email support for 30 days. Essentials and Standard include email and chat support. Premium includes phone support. Mailchimp’s support team understands email marketing, not just server configuration.

For most users, Mailchimp’s support is more practical. If you need help with campaign strategy, Mailchimp’s team can help. AWS support will help with infrastructure issues, not “why is my open rate low?”

AWS SES vs Mailchimp: Which One Should You Pick?

Choose AWS SES if:

• You have developers on your team (or are one)
• Email volume is high (50K+ per month) and budget matters
• You need transactional emails (order confirmations, password resets, OTPs)
• Your infrastructure already runs on AWS
• You want full control over sending reputation and IP addresses

Choose Mailchimp if:

• You’re a small team or solo marketer without coding skills
• You send fewer than 10,000 emails/month
• You need built-in automation, templates, and landing pages
• Budget isn’t a primary concern
• You want 300+ pre-built integrations

The Third Option: AWS SES Power with a Visual Interface

Here’s the thing most comparison articles won’t tell you: you don’t have to choose between cheap-but-complex and easy-but-expensive.

CampaignHQ connects directly to your AWS SES account and wraps it with everything marketers need: a drag-and-drop email builder, automation workflows, contact management, detailed analytics, and even WhatsApp marketing (something neither SES nor Mailchimp offers natively).

Your emails still send through SES at $0.10 per 1,000. But you get the convenience of a Mailchimp-style interface. For Indian businesses especially, this combination makes sense: you keep costs in check (paying in INR-friendly AWS billing) while your marketing team works independently without developer support.

No more choosing between power and simplicity. You get both.

India-Specific Considerations

If you’re running email campaigns from India, a few things matter more:

Currency and billing: AWS bills in USD but supports Indian payment methods and has a Mumbai (ap-south-1) region. Mailchimp bills in USD only. For a 25,000-contact list, you’re looking at roughly ₹830/month on SES vs ₹22,400/month on Mailchimp Standard. That’s a significant difference for bootstrapped startups.

Sending region: AWS SES Mumbai region means your emails originate from servers physically in India. This can improve delivery speed to Indian ISPs like Airtel, Jio, and BSNL mail servers.

WhatsApp integration: In India, WhatsApp is the dominant messaging platform with 500M+ users. Mailchimp doesn’t support WhatsApp campaigns. AWS SES doesn’t either. CampaignHQ offers WhatsApp alongside email, which is a major advantage for Indian D2C and e-commerce businesses.

For a broader comparison of email service providers popular in India, we’ve covered that separately.

ROI Comparison: 12-Month Analysis

Let’s project costs over a year for a mid-size business with 25,000 contacts sending 100,000 emails/month:

The ROI case is clear: if you’re spending more than $100/month on Mailchimp and your team can handle a slight learning curve, switching to an SES-based solution saves thousands annually.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is AWS SES cheaper than Mailchimp for small businesses?

Yes, almost always. AWS SES charges $0.10 per 1,000 emails with no contact-based fees. Even at low volumes (5,000 emails/month), SES costs about $0.50 compared to Mailchimp’s $13 to $20/month minimum. The gap widens dramatically as your list grows. The only scenario where Mailchimp’s free plan wins is if you have under 250 contacts and send fewer than 500 emails/month.

Can I use AWS SES without coding knowledge?

Not directly. AWS SES is an infrastructure service with no visual interface for creating campaigns. You need to either write code (using the API or SMTP) or use a front-end tool like CampaignHQ that connects to your SES account and provides a visual email builder, contact management, and automation. This approach gives you SES pricing without needing a developer.

Does Mailchimp have better deliverability than AWS SES?

Not necessarily. AWS SES consistently delivers inbox placement rates above 95% when configured properly (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, proper IP warming). Mailchimp uses shared IP pools for most plans, meaning your deliverability depends partly on other senders. For high-volume senders willing to manage their own reputation, SES typically matches or beats Mailchimp’s deliverability.

Can I migrate from Mailchimp to AWS SES easily?

The migration involves a few steps: export your contact list from Mailchimp, set up AWS SES with domain verification and production access, recreate your email templates (in HTML or through a tool like CampaignHQ), and configure automation workflows. The technical setup takes 1 to 3 days. The hardest part is recreating complex automation sequences if you’ve built many in Mailchimp.

Which platform is better for Indian businesses sending bulk emails?

AWS SES is the clear winner for cost-conscious Indian businesses. With the Mumbai region (ap-south-1), you get local infrastructure. At ₹8.3 per 1,000 emails versus Mailchimp’s ₹1,000+ per month for even small lists, the savings are substantial. Pair SES with a front-end like CampaignHQ, and you also get WhatsApp marketing, which is critical for reaching Indian consumers.

Final Verdict

AWS SES and Mailchimp serve different needs. SES is raw infrastructure: cheap, powerful, and flexible, but requires technical skills. Mailchimp is a complete marketing platform: easy and feature-rich, but expensive at scale.

For growing businesses (especially in India), the smartest move might be neither extreme. Use AWS SES for its unbeatable pricing and pair it with a platform like CampaignHQ for the visual tools your marketing team needs. You save money, keep control, and don’t sacrifice usability.

Your email platform should work for your budget, not against it.